Thanks for the input! Öhlins recommends less sag than what you have, but I suppose your number is what you’ve arrived at with riding experience?I thought I would give my 2 cents worth to try and help I have set my Rear spring at 25%of travel (36mm) and my front at 30% of travel(39mm with upgraded springs as im too heavy for the standard oem) this is my personal setting that gives me as much ride Hight as possible through hard cornering where the suspension is fully compressed. With regards to yours it does sound like the rear has too much preload for reference the difference between my Extended / top out SAG (bike lifted with no weight) and my Free/Static SAG Bike under its own weight) is 5mm at the rear and that's at the 25% of travel so once you had yours set at 30% of 144mm = 43.2mm then I would expect you to have about 10mm of extended travel. If so then the spring is fine and ideal.
Seems like your getting there :smile2: I like to listen in to discussions on suspension as I think I have a good grasp and understanding of it. Yes you are right My SAG is slightly out of recommendations (By design) my front is spot on as I have swapped out my Front 80nm for 95nm to perfectly suit my weight, but the rear is still stock which I have tried to adapt. (my thinking was its adequate enough to carry 2 people so I should be able to make it work for me) In reality I need to upgrade the rear to a slightly stiffer spring so that I can set the SAG at around 30% without loosing precious ride Hight while compressed in corners . The rear spring is progressive and a harder spring will be better for me as it will compress less at the critical moments. If I ride normal everything is ok as is but when hitting it hard in the Twisties I have had everything scraping including the kick stand, gear lever and break lever. this is why I have set the rear as I have to avoid this happening till I get a new rear spring. Enjoy the journey mate the suspension on this bike is great and confidence inspiring when its set up right. good luckThanks for the input! Öhlins recommends less sag than what you have, but I suppose your number is what you’ve arrived at with riding experience?
In my case, I’m still going on theory mostly as I haven’t had enough time to ride the bike, nor in suitable conditions, so for now I’ll stick with the default recommendations.
Sure the Ohlins rep didn't say the shock has a top out spring? I wouldn't have expected it would. A heavy or long top out spring can influence sag numbers in a shock or forks.I just checked the spring, and it’s the stock 105 N/mm one. I asked this same question on another forum and was so fortunate to get a reply from someone who works for Öhlins at their race department in Sweden (supposedly he’s been consulted during the development of the SS. According to him, normally no static sag would indicate a too soft spring. However, the shock in the SSS doesn’t have a top out spring, which with a stock spring rate that’s on the heavier side for my weight (80 kg in the flesh) can give the behaviour I mentioned. That is, no static sag when correct rider sag has been set doesn’t have to be an anomaly in this case.
John, which spring do you have? Stock? No issues getting reasonable sag?
Yeah, positive, as he had previously (in another thread) praised the high spec of the SSS suspension components, but once he looked into the spec noticed it didn’t have a top out spring and therefore said he “might have to revise my previous statement regarding the high spec of the SSS’s (!) shock” (paraphrasing the original Swedish here).Sure the Ohlins rep didn't say the shock has a top out spring? I wouldn't have expected it would. A heavy or long top out spring can influence sag numbers in a shock or forks.
Me, I don't even own an SS. I joined the forum when the bike was first announced, and just look in from time to time, contributing to 'generic' discussions if I think I can contribute. That's usually just suspensions as they all work pretty much the same (other than semi active, etc,) on any bike.
So I’ve done a bit of researching, reading the article you’ve linked and several others and all are pretty much stating the same thing I highlighted above, and it took me a bit of pondering to figure out why my other experiences with suspension tuners, other reading I’ve done on the subject and my experience with the wrong spring on my CBR and I think I’ve hit on the factor that makes the above statement true as well:SPRING RATE -
Spring Rate OK - Both free and rider sag within acceptable range.
Spring Rate too soft - Rider Sag OK, but too little or no Free Sag
Spring Rate too firm - Rider Sag OK, but too much Free Sag
.